<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>agj writes: &#187; cinema</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.agj.cl/tag/cinema/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.agj.cl</link>
	<description>where agj pours his mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 03:11:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Cities of Jem Cohen</title>
		<link>http://blog.agj.cl/2009/08/cities-of-jem-cohen/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.agj.cl/2009/08/cities-of-jem-cohen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 06:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agj</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinema]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.agj.cl/?p=349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had the opportunity to hear Jem Cohen talk three times in the past three days. The first was a supposed ‘master class’, which was really just a talk, where he was accompanied by Guy Picciotto (of Fugazi) and Todd Griffin, both musicians. The talk was called Another kind of music, and it was about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the opportunity to hear Jem Cohen talk three times in the past three days. The first was a supposed ‘master class’, which was really just a talk, where he was accompanied by Guy Picciotto (of Fugazi) and Todd Griffin, both musicians. The talk was called <em>Another kind of music</em>, and it was about the way he approaches filmmaking in relation to sound and music. One of his insights was that making films can be a bit like making music; there’s rhythm, texture, and other sensory elements in the mix, beside the more evident aspect of narrative that is most films’ core. He also said that the way he shoots his footage is akin to a musician’s improvisation.</p>
<p>He showed some of his short films/videos, or fragments of them. One of those was <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbcmgWX6jQw"><em>Little flags</em></a>, which will give you an idea of what he does. The truth is, I went to this talk not knowing anything about this man, other than him being a filmmaker, and his link to music. For, you see, he seems to often work with musicians, or simply make sound a vital part of his work. The day before that talk, I was seeing Avi Mograbi’s <em>Z32</em> while one of Jem’s works was being screened elsewhere, called <em>Ciudad de México por azar</em>, with simultaneous live music by the aforementioned musicians, plus DJ Rupture and Andy Moor. I didn’t know this event was taking place, or I would have been there, especially after seeing <em>Chain</em> the evening after the talk, which was already a day too late anyway. <em>Chain</em> is a feature-length, sharp, documentary-like view on the culture of consumerism. After the screening of that movie, he was there to answer questions and talk a bit about it.</p>
<p>He’s here in Chile because of Sanfic, the Santiago International Film Festival, which has been my chance to see some new films, and also hear the directors talk about them, which is quite an interesting experience. The final time I saw Jem was after a showing of a few of his shorts, including <em>Lost book found</em>, most likely the highlight among the bunch. In this short, he tells his story of what it was like being a push cart vendor in the city, and his discovery of a notebook that was filled with a strictly categorized, but seemingly nonsensical, list of numbers, places, things, situations related to the city. I asked him whether the story was real, to which he said it partially was. He refused to say if the book ever existed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.agj.cl/2009/08/cities-of-jem-cohen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glory to the filmmaker!</title>
		<link>http://blog.agj.cl/2008/08/glory-to-the-filmmaker/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.agj.cl/2008/08/glory-to-the-filmmaker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agj</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinema]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.agj.cl/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Takeshi ‘Beat’ Kitano is my favorite director in Japan right now. The first film of his that I watched was Dolls; at the time, it had been recently premiered (2002 or 3.) Someone from the Internet community I used to frequent was praising the film, so, fan of everything Japanese as I was back then, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Takeshi ‘Beat’ Kitano is my favorite director in Japan right now. The first film of his that I watched was <em>Dolls;</em> at the time, it had been recently premiered (2002 or 3.) Someone from the Internet community I used to frequent was praising the film, so, fan of everything Japanese as I was back then, I went looking for it. Now, my memory gets fuzzy at this point, but of one thing I’m sure: I ended up not only watching <em>Dolls,</em> but <em>Hana-bi</em> too, and while the former was a good movie with interesting cinematography, it’s the latter which really caught my interest and made me the fan that I’m now. The film was so very contrasted; it was violent but it was not raw as life, it was preternatural, it sublimated the awful and the quietly beautiful and confronted them, just  as black and white struggle in the chiaroscuro of a romanticist painting. The stillness and the orthogonal perspective and framing of the camera captivated me.</p>
<p>The perhaps strange thing do consider is that, in his early years of fame, Kitano performed as ‘Beat Takeshi’ in <em>manzai</em> comedy duo <em>Two Beat.</em> Last night I watched <em>Glory to the Filmmaker!</em> <em>(Kantoku, Banzai!,)</em> a comedy that seems to harken back to those days. It’s worth mentioning that this is not his first comedy, but it does seem to be his silliest. It could easily be divided into parts and made into a TV show; even better if it’s live, with the audience laughing and interacting. Office Kitano’s troupe would do great in television, if this movie is any indication, as I constantly felt the actors about to come out of the screen, almost talking directly to me; breaking the fourth wall is not a new thing for Kitano, but it seemed like the whole point this time around. For starters, the movie is about Kitano himself (again, nothing new,) or, rather —in a way that reminded me of Adaptation,— about his troubles trying to make a film. But the script is fanciful, so while that is the point of the movie for the first half hour or so, it promptly forgets about all that and decides to just incoherently throw situation after situation, loosely tied by the characters and a certain chronological continuity—and this is what I meant by it being perfect for television. I spent most of the movie staring at the screen and going ‘what the F?,’ too offput to even laugh, as I had a hard time even deciding when it would be appropriate. Yes, it’s a weird, stream-of-consciousness, post-modern comedy; and if that sounds appealing, then it won’t disappoint you. Me, I actually liked the film immediately preceding it in Kitano’s filmography better: <em>Takeshis’.</em></p>
<p>Maybe this fact is true of <em>Glory…</em> as well, but probably more so for this film: You should watch it only after you have amassed a decent number of Kitano’s movies under your belt; otherwise, most of the irony will be lost on you. It’s an absurd comedy as well, but in it, the character of Kitano himself, as a director, is at the center of the attention the whole time. Here, Kitano is not only himself, but also a regular, quiet store clerk that happens to be a fan of Kitano’s. After he meets him and is ridiculed by his idol, the story drifts into the surreal; every character has a more sordid double in town, and the store clerk-Kitano turns into a parody of the yakuza characters that Kitano himself has impersonated in his gangster films. This time the script loses coherence but not focus, as it is delivered at a tight and ridiculous pace. It feels like a film the whole time through, too.</p>
<p>If the abovementioned films are meant for a knowledgeable fan, then the complete opposite must be <em>Zatoichi,</em> apparently his most commercially successful film to date. The good thing about it is that he does not compromise; yes, it’s part of a franchise (not unlike England’s James Bond,) but the movie still exhudes Kitano. It’s an action/comedy flick of a blind swordsman, which sounds (and is) a clichéd concept, but the Kitano flavor takes precedence: you’ll be amazed when the tap dance group The Stripes intervenes in the background; it gave <em>me</em> goosebumps, at least. If you’re new to the glorious filmmaker, then give this film a watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.agj.cl/2008/08/glory-to-the-filmmaker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
